Teaching machine

In 1953, B. F. Skinner visited his daughter's math class. The Harvard psychologist found every pupil learning the same topic in the same way, at the same speed. A few days later, he built his first "teaching machine", which let children tackle questions at their own pace. By the mid-1960s, similar gizmos were being flogged by door-to-door sales representatives. Within a few years, though, enthusiasm for them had fizzled out. Since then, education technology (EdTech) has repeated the cycle of hype and flop, even as computers have reshaped almost every other part of life. One reason is the conservatism of teachers and their unions. But another is that the brain-stretching potential of EdTech has remained unproven. Today, however, Skinner's heirs are forcing the skeptics to think again (see article). Backed by billionaire techies such as Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, schools around the world are using new software to "personalize" learning. This could help hundreds of millions of children stuck in dismal classes, but only if EdTech boosters can resist the temptation to revive harmful ideas about how children learn. To succeed, EdTech must be at the service of teaching, not the other way around. The conventional model of schooling emerged in Prussia in the 18th century. Alternatives have so far failed to teach as many children as efficiently. Classrooms, hierarchical year-groups, standardized curriculums and fixed timetables are still the norm for most of the world's nearly 1.5bn schoolchildren.