Peter Garrett
No one in Parliament would know better than Peter Garrett what largesse copyright can confer so it may seem right that he should announce a [blank] for artists, amounting to 5 percent of all sales after the original one, which can go on giving to their families for as much as 150 years. But that ignores the truth that copyright law is a [blank] , recently exacerbated by the Free Trade Agreement with the US which required extension of copyright to 70 years after death. Is it scandalous that really valuable copyrights end up in the ownership of corporations (although Agatha Christie's no-doubt worthy great-grandchildren are still [blank] the benefits of West End success for her whodunnits and members of the Garrick Club enjoy the continuing fruits of A.A. Milne's Christopher Robin books)? No. The scandal is that being peasant politicians have attempted to appear cultured by creating private assets that depend on an act of Parliament for their existence and by giving away [blank] more in value than any public benefit could justify. In doing so they have betrayed our trust.
Sample Answer & Audio Transcript
Practice This Question with Real-Time AI Scoring
Record your voice or submit your writing to get official Pearson-aligned scores (10-90) across Oral Fluency, Pronunciation, Grammar, and Content in 1.2 seconds.
Pearson Official Scoring Guide for Reading & Writing: Fill in the Blanks
Scored Enabling Skills
- Communicative Skills & Enabling Skills
Timing Standard
Response Window: Official Pearson Exam Standard