#FIB-RW-23000744Reading & Writing: Fill in the BlanksCore & AcademicMediumReal Exam Prediction

Olympic Medalists

Official Question Material
Prep: Varies

In an often-cited study about counterfactuals, Medvec, Madey, and Gilovich (1995) found that bronze medalists appeared happier than silver medalists in television coverage of the 1992 Summer Olympics. Medvec et al. [blank] that bronze medalists compared themselves to 4th place finishers, [blank] silver medalists compared themselves to gold medalists. These counterfactuals were the most salient because they were either qualitatively different (gold vs. silver) or categorically different (medal vs. no medal) from what [blank] occurred. Drawing on archival data and experimental studies, we show that Olympic athletes (among others) are more likely to make counterfactual comparisons based on their [blank] expectations, consistent with decision affect theory. Silver medalists are more likely to be disappointed because their personal expectations are higher than [blank] of bronze medalists.

Sample Answer & Audio Transcript

In an often-cited study about counterfactuals, Medvec, Madey, and Gilovich (1995) found that bronze medalists appeared happier than silver medalists in television coverage of the 1992 Summer Olympics. Medvec et al. argued that bronze medalists compared themselves to 4th place finishers, whereas silver medalists compared themselves to gold medalists. These counterfactuals were the most salient because they were either qualitatively different (gold vs. silver) or categorically different (medal vs. no medal) from what actually occurred. Drawing on archival data and experimental studies, we show that Olympic athletes (among others) are more likely to make counterfactual comparisons based on their prior expectations, consistent with decision affect theory. Silver medalists are more likely to be disappointed because their personal expectations are higher than those of bronze medalists.
Instant AI Speech & Writing Feedback

Practice This Question with Real-Time AI Scoring

Record your voice or submit your writing to get official Pearson-aligned scores (10-90) across Oral Fluency, Pronunciation, Grammar, and Content in 1.2 seconds.

Launch AI Practice Now

Pearson Official Scoring Guide for Reading & Writing: Fill in the Blanks

Scored Enabling Skills

  • Communicative Skills & Enabling Skills

Timing Standard

Response Window: Official Pearson Exam Standard

💡 Examiner Strategy & Pro Tip:Maintain focus on accuracy, timing, and Pearson automated scoring rubrics.